Some of you may have seen Chris Packham’s rightfully angry video about an Ofsted training manual that states that autistic children are more likely to be radicalised than their non-autistic peers. If you haven’t seen the video, have a look here.

I’ve dug a little deeper trying to find the training manual, and the closest I could find with a quick look this morning was a Huffpost quote about it (link to the article is here). A quote in the article is that the training manual reportedly says:

“Children and young people with autism are at increased risk of being susceptible to extremism. This is because they are more likely to develop special interests.

“Due to this and any social communication needs, children with autism are more likely to experience social isolation and so use the internet as a way to find friends. They trust the information they read and the ‘friends’ that they find online and so can be drawn into extremism.”

I am with Chris Packham on this. It’s an inflammatory and ableist statement that doesn’t begin to look at why this may happen, and why swathes of young people (not just autistic children) are also at risk.

Autistic children are an easy target here. The general perception of autistic people is that they’re socially awkward, gullible, they don’t have friends and they don’t have a big social group. This maybe true for some autistic people, but definitely not all of them. It’s also true for many non-autistic children. To single out one neurodivergent group is wrong.

Children are struggling in the 21st century, and even more post covid. The waiting list for support can be years long. Those with mental health issues may not be seen until they get to crisis point, and even then, at crisis point, there are often waiting lists. This is not because the NHS is bad, it’s because mental health support for all ages is woefully underfunded. CAMHS (Children and adolescent mental health services) are overwhelmed. Local governments cannot afford SEND support, and families are waiting far too long for EHCPs.

Even children without mental health issues can feel lonely and isolated, and seek a community or understanding group online.

If we look at the rhetoric in the media (print, online and social) there is so much negativity, and sectors of society are portrayed as not contributing. Added to that the pressure to look or behave a certain way, to get high grades, to achieve, to have friends, to have a social life, to get a partner, to be straight, thin, pretty, handsome…..the list goes on and on.

Imagine being 13. You’ve just moved to a new area. You are tall (or small) for your age. You’re not great at sports, you can’t afford the latest phone, and you feel that you’ll never fit in. Your parent(s) work long hours to pay the rent, so after school you’re on your own. You haven’t made new friends, you feel lonely and so you turn on your phone and start scrolling. You find a page on social media that seems to be talking to people like you. You join the group and start conversations, and you feel that people are really listening to you. You don’t feel lonely any more, and you feel that you have new friends who understand you.

You don’t have to be autistic to feel like this. It can be any teenager (or adult) who either doesn’t meet societal expectations, or just feels a little different.

Social media wasn’t a thing when I was a teen, but if it had been, there were times when I could have looked for an online tribe.

Chris Packham is right to be angry, and Ofsted should not have singled out one group of society. However, society is pushing children and young adults towards online communities. Schools are not inclusive. Many people feel disenfranchised and left out. We are a tribal species. We have evolved to be part of groups, to have a feeling of belonging. If it isn’t found in person, there’s a huge online world to find their place.

Let’s stop blaming the people who are being groomed or radicalised online and instead solve the reasons why, and give the young people the support and community they need in real life. If school and society are inclusive, and if hateful, blaming rhetoric stops, and if the media is accepting, maybe that would be the biggest step towards reducing grooming and radicalisation.